Is Trademark an intangible asset for MSMEs or an Expense?

Is Trademark an intangible asset for MSMEs or an Expense - Intellect Vidhya

Shakespeare famously said, ‘What’s in a name?’ However, this expression no longer applies because today the entire reputation, goodwill, and fame rest with the name, i.e., a trademark; therefore the question ‘is trademark is an intangible asset?’ has an affirmative response.

Trademark as an Intangible Asset

A trademark is a name that a brand or business employs to allow consumers to recognize their brand and to differentiate their name from the rest in the market. When a brand or company achieves greater market share and consumer loyalty, the likelihood that other competitors may copy a similar name to deceive the public and profit monetarily increases.

To prevent others from using a similar or deceptive similar trademark, it is essential to have a registered trademark, which grants not only the exclusive right to use the mark but also the right to initiate legal action against those infringing on this right. In the same way, a trademark is more than simply a name; it also represents a company’s operations, services, reputation, and efforts.

A trademark carries huge weight and is valuable since it is associated with a firm’s reputation, and given the significance of trademarks; the question ‘is trademark is an intangible asset? has just one acceptable reply, and that is an emphatic “YES”; it cannot be denied that a trademark is an intangible asset for a business or a company.

Intangible Asset vs Tangible Asset

A tangible asset has a finite value and physical existence; it may be sold, acquired, or transferred for monetary compensation, but an intangible asset is a beneficial potential that does not have physical existence. These assets provide financial benefits to the company, but they are intangible, as opposed to tangible assets. Intangible assets include all forms of intellectual property, such as patents, copyrights, designs, and trademarks.

MSMEs and Indian Economy

MSME stands for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises. MSME were first time defined under the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act in 2006. The act was recently changed in 2020 with considerable revisions in the numbers pertaining to investment and turnover, which led to an increased number of medium-sized businesses.

  • A microenterprise is an enterprise where investment doesn’t exceed Rs. 1 crore and where the turnover doesn’t exceed 5 crores.
  • A small enterprise is an enterprise where investment is more than Rs. 10 crore and where the turnover doesn’t exceed 50 crores.
  • A medium enterprise is an enterprise where the investment is not more than 50 crores and the turnover doesn’t exceed 250 crores.

The Indian government has promoted MSMEs with programs and initiatives such as ‘Atamnirbhar Bharat’ and ‘Make in India’,  with the assistance of government-provided subsidies and cost-cutting measures, the MSME sector in India is growing and booming like no other industry. 

Protection without registering trademark 

As indicated previously, the MSME sector in India is expanding, and such expansion typically increases market rivalry. The growth and reputation of a MSME will entice others to use a similar or deceptively similar name to deceive the public or to profit from its goodwill. In such cases, without a registered trademark, the only recourse for the proprietors of a MSME is to go to court and employ the common law tort of passing off which requires money and time.

It is possible to shorten such a laborious procedure of enforcing a trademark by providing the infringer with a trademark registration certificate. The infringer is unlikely to oppose a valid trademark registration certificate in a court of law. Without having a registered trademark, it is not possible to directly sue competitors for trademark infringement, and the trademark is more likely to be copied. A registered trademark increases the business’s valuation and prevents others from registering a similar mark.

Trademark as a Necessity 

When an MSME is incorporated, it is with the intention of seeking expansion and prosperity. For larger firms, there are numerous compliances that must be met, but for MSMEs, the government has taken a liberal stance and ignored much compliance in order to reduce the costs associated with the development of MSMEs. Each compliance must be weighed according to its importance.

When it comes to trademark registration, MSME owners have a tendency to disregard or delay the process, deeming it unnecessary or an unnecessary investment. However, a trademark is not an additional investment; rather, it is an intangible asset that will yield more profits in the future. By paying minor fees at the time of registration, a registered trademark saves a MSME from future expenditures on passing-off actions.

Trademark Registration for MSMEs

The 2017 amendment to the Trademark regulations has drastically decreased the registration fee. In general, the Trademark office charges proprietorship firms Rs.4500/- per class per application and non-proprietorship firms Rs.9000/- per class every application. However, enterprises with MSME registration are required to pay a registration fee of Rs.4500/- per class every application, which is half of what other companies must pay. 

The registration procedure is relatively straightforward and few documents are required. The materials necessary for trademark registration by MSMEs are proof of identity and address of the applicant, proof of address of the organization, a partnership agreement or certificate of incorporation, an MSME registration certificate, and the trademark to be registered.

An Intangible Asset that is more valuable than any Tangible asset

A trademark is an intangible asset that, with the passage of time, has the potential to grow to be larger and more valuable than any other tangible asset. The only thing that enables average customers to identify a company with which they are familiar is a trademark, which serves as the identity of a brand. It is possible to buy, sell, or licence a trademark, just like any other tangible asset; yet, a trademark’s value extends far beyond its monetary worth; it is also responsible for an MSME’s goodwill, trust, and repute in the marketplace.

Conclusion

MSMEs are one of the most important contributors to the Indian economy. However, there is a dearth of awareness regarding the protection of intellectual property rights among the entrepreneurs. Considering the potential of infringement in future the MSMEs must look at the trademark registration as a necessary step and not as and added expense. A minimal fee for registering the trademark can save a huge amount on the legal proceedings that might come up in the future and it will also protect the goodwill of a MSME in the market.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Categories

Search

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • All Post
    • Copyright
    • Design Patents
    • Patent Filing
    • Patent Search
    • Trademark
    • Uncategorized

    Related Posts

    The principle of 'Continuous Use' in Trademark Law - Intellect Vidhya

    The principle of ‘Continuous Use’ in Trademark Law

    While talking about Trademark law regime, the principle of ‘continuous use’ plays a crucial role in shaping the validity and enforceability of trademark rights. In India, similar to many other jurisdictions, one of the most known ways to establish the exclusive rights over a trademark is through continuous and consistent usage of the mark in commerce or in course of trade. Even if the formal registration is not granted, a trademark can still be protected based on its consistent use in the market. This article explores the principle of continuous use under Indian trademark law, its significance, and how it impacts the protection and enforcement of trademarks. What is the Principle of Continuous Use? The principle of continuous use in trademark law refers to the long and consistent use of a trademark by its owner in the course of trade in business. The continuous and uninterrupted use of the trademark assists in establishing the goodwill and reputation of the brand in the market. The older a trademark, the greater its reputation and goodwill. The Trademarks Act, 1999, acknowledges the importance of continuous use by offering protection to both registered and unregistered trademarks. The primary aim of this principle is to ensure that the rights over a trademark belong to the entity that has genuinely used the mark in commerce over time. The Legal Foundation of Continuous Use in India According to Indian trademark law, Section 34 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, addresses the principle of continuous use, highlighting the concept of “prior use.” This section states that a registered trademark owner cannot prevent any individual or business from continuing to use a mark if they have been using it consistently since before the trademark was registered. This provision is crucial as it emphasises use rather than registration. This means that even if a third party registers a trademark, the party that has been using the mark continuously for the longest time holds superior rights to it. Key Points of Section 34: Importance of Continuous Use 1. Establishing Priority Continuous use plays a crucial role in establishing priority over a trademark. If there is a conflict in rights, the trademark used earlier and without interruption has better rights to claim its use over that of the owner if it contrasts with the registered trademark holder. This is especially relevant in India, where the “first-to-use” principle precedes the common law concept of a “First-to-file”. 2. Preventing Abandonment This continuous use will prevent the trademark from being deemed abandoned. Failure to use a trademark without proper reason over an extended period may lead the authorities to declare it abandoned, and as such lose its rights. According to Indian trademark law, a mark needs to be used continuously in trade so as to retain its enforceability. Failure to do so can open the door for third parties to challenge the ownership of the trademark. 3. Reputation and Goodwill The longer you use a trademark, the more related goodwill and recognition will be gained that are important elements for every brand. A business expands sufficient identity allowing consumers to relate the brand with quality, trustworthiness or in a specific product or service. A trademark that has been used continuously over time under Indian law may qualify as a “well-known trademark” and receive additional protection, even in categories where it is not even directly used. 4. Protection for Unregistered Trademarks In the case of unregistered trademarks, continuous use is especially important. While unregistered marks are not protected under the Indian Trademarks Act, they may still be safeguarded by utilizing English common law rights called “passing off.” In as action of passing off, long time use would help the plaintiff establish that their mark has gathered good will and that the defendant’s use of a similar mark would likely deceive consumers and cause harm to their business. Proving Continuous Use Having continuous use and proving the same are two different things. Mentioned below are the kinds of documents that can be furnished in order to prove the continuous use of a particular trademark: Challenges to Continuous Use While continuous use is a strong principle in Indian trademark law, it does come with certain challenges: Relevant Case Laws The Supreme Court made clear that the rights of prior users are stronger than trademark registration. So just because a trademark is registered does not mean the original user of that domain cannot infringe on your rights. The court decided in Peps’ favour, indicating that a mark can still receive protection even if it is descriptive, provided it has acquired distinctiveness through ongoing use. Conclusion The principle of continuous use serves as a fundamental aspect of trademark law in India, offering protection to businesses that have consistently used their trademarks over the years, regardless of registration status. It ensures that the true owner of a trademark is the one who has consistently utilised it in commerce, rather than simply the one who registered it first. Indian trademark law seeks to promote fairness and preserve the goodwill that businesses build around their brands by emphasising use rather than formal registration. It is essential for both businesses and individuals to consistently use their trademarks in order to protect their rights and avoid potential legal conflicts.

    Read More »
    October 28, 2024 No Comments
    Work for Hire in the IP World Copyright and Patents - Intellect Vidhya

    Work for Hire in the IP World: Copyright and Patents

    When it comes to the creation of Intellectual property the concept of “work for hire” plays a pivotal role, especially in the domains of copyright and patent law. This legal principle determines who holds the ownership of intellectual property created in the course of employment or under a contractual agreement. While the idea of “work for hire” may seem straightforward, its implications can be complex and vary significantly between different types of IP, such as copyrights and patents. This article explores the concept of “work for hire” in the context of Indian law and how it affects ownership and rights related to copyright and patents. What is “Work for Hire”? The concept of “work for hire” refers to a situation where a person or entity, typically an employer or contractor, hires an individual (an employee or an independent contractor) to create a specific piece of intellectual property, and as a result, the ownership of the work is automatically assigned to the hiring party. In the Indian IP context, work for hire influences two major areas: 1. Copyrights (for creative works like writings, music, films, software, etc.) 2. Patents (for inventions and innovations). The way “work for hire” operates under Indian law differs slightly in each of these categories, and understanding these distinctions is crucial for creators, employers, and businesses alike. Work for Hire in Indian Copyright Law Legal Framework In India, copyright is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957. Under this Act, the principle of “work for hire” is enshrined in Section 17, which deals with the ownership of copyright. Generally, the author or creator of a work is the first owner of the copyright. However, there are exceptions to this rule, one of the most significant being works created under employment or commission, which are considered “works for hire.” Ownership of Copyright According to Section 17 of the Copyright Act, the employer or commissioning party will be the first owner of the copyright in the following cases: 1. In the Course of Employment: If a work is created by an employee in the course of their employment, the employer is deemed the first owner of the copyright, unless there is an agreement to the contrary.   2. Commissioned Work: If a work is created on commission for a specific purpose, the party commissioning the work will own the copyright unless there is an agreement to the contrary. In the case Khemraj Shrikrishnadass v. M/s Garg & Co., the court addressed the issue of copyright ownership concerning work for hire under Indian law. The court held that in the absence of a contract stating otherwise, when an author creates a work at the request of another party for remuneration, the copyright typically passes to the person who commissioned the work. This reinforces the general principle that unless an explicit contract exists, the employer or commissioner becomes the first owner of the copyright in such works created during employment or as commissioned assignments. Moral Rights Even though the employer or commissioning party owns the copyright, the creator still retains moral rights under Indian law, including the right to claim authorship and prevent modifications that could harm the creator’s reputation. Work for Hire in Indian Patent Law Legal Framework In India, patent rights are governed by the Patents Act, 1970. Unlike copyright, where the work-for-hire principle is relatively clear, patent law presents a more nuanced situation. Ownership of a patent typically depends on the terms of employment and whether the invention was created within the scope of the inventor’s duties. Ownership of Patents There is no automatic “work for hire” rule for patents in India as there is in copyright law. Instead, the inventor is considered the “first owner” of the patent and the ownership of inventions depends on the terms of the employment contract or a specific assignment agreement. This means that while an employee is the actual inventor, ownership of the patent can only be transferred to the employer through a written contract or agreement. Furthermore, there is always a separate debate about the inventions created by the employee during the course of employment and since the inventor (employee in this case) is the first owner of the patents the Employers are advised to always execute a assignment agreement in place. 1. In the Course of Employment: If an employee invents something as part of their job duties (e.g., researchers, engineers), the employer generally owns the patent subject to the assignment agreement. 2. Outside Employment Duties: If an employee invents something unrelated to their job description and outside the use of company resources, the employee may have the right to the patent. The case of Darius Rutton Kavasmaneck v. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. (2014) revolves around a dispute concerning intellectual property rights in the context of patent law and “work for hire.” The case involved the question of whether the inventions and patents developed by Kavasmaneck, a key employee of Gharda Chemicals, belonged to him individually or to the company. The court ruled in favor of Gharda Chemicals, affirming that the inventions created by Kavasmaneck during his tenure with the company fell under the “work for hire” doctrine, as they were made in the course of his employment and used the company’s resources. This case highlights the importance of employment agreements and the principle that inventions made by employees in the scope of their work duties are typically owned by the employer Comparing Copyright and Patent Work for Hire While the concept of work for hire is prevalent in both copyright and patent law, there are some key differences: 1. Automatic Ownership:    – In copyright, the employer or commissioner is typically the automatic owner unless there is an agreement to the contrary.    – In patent law, ownership depends on the employment context and the existence of a clear agreement, as the inventor is the first and original owner by default. 2.   Scope of Work:    – In   copyright, almost any work created within the course of employment may fall under work

    Read More »
    October 28, 2024 No Comments
    Copyright Protection for Sound Recordings - Intellect Vidhya

    Understanding Copyright for Sound Recordings

    Copyright for sound recordings is a vital aspect of intellectual property law, protecting the rights of creators and ensuring they maintain control over their work. Sound recordings, whether they are music tracks, podcasts, or other audio forms, are protected by copyright, granting the owner exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and publicly perform the work. This article will walk you through the basics of sound recording copyright: what it protects, how a traditional right has evolved into an increasingly important one in digital times and how digital distribution impacts your copyright rights. What is Copyright for Sound Recordings? Copyright for sound recordings refers to the legal protection granted to the specific performance or recording of a sound. This protection is separate from the copyright in the underlying musical composition or lyrics — it covers only the actual recorded sounds. For example, when an artist records a song, the sound recording copyright protects that particular recorded version while composition of music and lyrics are protected by means of their own copyright. Copyright owners of sound recordings have several exclusive rights, including: These rights allow creators to determine how their recordings can be used and for which they will receive royalties if others use the work. Duration of Copyright Protection for Sound Recordings The Copyright Act, 1957 of India governs protection duration for copyright in sound recordings. In India, sound recordings are protected for a period of 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which such recording is published. This is also in line with the international framework that India has subscribed to, as a member of Berne Convention. As a result of this protection, sound recordings in India are given a standardised period of copyright that may be slightly different from other jurisdictions but one which generally ensures the robust protection to creative works. How Digital Distribution Impacts Your Copyright Rights? The digital environment has transformed the manner in which sound recordings are distributed and includes online platforms (e.g., streaming, downloads) and social media. This has led to many new opportunities for creators, and at the same time created more complications in copyright clearance. Digital distribution impacts your copyright rights in several ways: The Role of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) Collective Management Organizations (CMOs), also known as Performing Rights Organizations (PROs), also have a major role in taking care of the Copyright for sound recordings. These organizations collect royalties on behalf of copyright owners when their recordings are played publicly, whether on the radio, in public spaces, or online. Joining a CMO gives creators protection in the form to get paid for using their recordings. They support the enforcement of copyright by monitoring usage, and acting against not authorised uses on behalf of their members Copyright Infringement and Remedies Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses a sound recording without permission, violating the copyright holder’s exclusive rights. Infringement can take many forms, including unauthorized copying, distribution, or public performance of the recording. When infringement occurs, copyright holders have several remedies available: Conclusion Sound recording copyright is an essential tool to defend the interests of its creators as it allows control and benefit their productions. With the evolution of digital distribution, it has become even more critical to understand how here-to-for basic principles affect your copyright rights. Keeping up to date about your entitlements, using copyright aids and working with CMOs will enable creators in their quest to protect against unauthorised use of sound recordings.

    Read More »
    August 28, 2024 No Comments
    The Basics of a Non-Disclosure Agreement NDA - Intellect Vidhya solutions

    The Basics of a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

    In a world where more information is everywhere, keeping data safe and secret is imperative. It does not matter if you are an entrepreneur, fellow worker, or business partner in this industry; having good knowledge about the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is extremely important to secure some of your confidential data. This article explores the very basics of NDAs and why they are important, as well as how they manifest themselves in a variety of different scenarios. What is a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)? A Non-Disclosure Agreement, commonly known as an NDA, is a legally binding contract that establishes a confidential relationship between two or more parties. Parties use an NDA to ensure that information they exchange during their relationship stays out of the hands of unauthorized parties. In general, NDAs are very common in business-related situations, such as those relating to trade secrets and associated information that is valuable, including the methods. Why Are NDAs Important? NDAs are essential for several reasons: 1. Protecting Confidential Information: NDAs protect a company’s confidential information, things like business plans, marketing strategies, financial data and intellectual property. This security is critical to have a competitive advantage and prevent misuse or sharing of key information. 2. Establishing trust: With an NDA in place, parties show their willingness to keep information private which then builds and security. This trust is crucial on collaborations, partnerships and negotiations when sensitive information has to be shared. 3. Legal Recourse: Lastly, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) serves as a legal tool for pursuing action against anyone who breaches the confidentiality. The remedies available to the party that has not breached include monetary damages, specific performance, or injunctive relief. Key Elements of NDA While NDAs can vary in complexity depending on the situation, they generally include the following key elements: Why are NDA used? NDAs are commonly employed in a wide range of scenarios to safeguard confidential information. They are frequently utilised in business partnerships to enable companies to exchange confidential information without concerns of it being disclosed. During employment, NDAs are put in place to safeguard trade secrets that employees may come across in the course of their work. Mergers and acquisitions also depend on NDAs to safeguard vital information throughout negotiations. When developing new products, NDAs are put in place to prevent suppliers or testers from misusing the information. NDAs are crucial in investment discussions to safeguard business plans and intellectual property, as well as in IP patent agreements to prevent the unauthorised disclosure of innovations. In general, NDAs play a crucial role in preserving confidentiality in various aspects of business and law. Legal Validity of NDAs The legal standing of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) is rooted in contract law, making them legally binding documents that enforce confidentiality between parties. When properly drafted and executed, NDAs are enforceable in court, allowing the injured party to seek remedies such as injunctions or damages if the agreement is breached. However, for an NDA to hold up legally, it must be clear, reasonable in scope, and not overly restrictive. Courts will also consider the fairness of the agreement, ensuring that it doesn’t impose undue hardship on the parties involved. Conclusion Non-Disclosure Agreements are powerful tools for protecting confidential information and fostering trust between parties. By clearly defining what constitutes confidential information, outlining the obligations of the receiving party, and specifying the consequences of a breach, NDAs help prevent the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data. Whether you’re entering into a business partnership, hiring employees, or developing new products, understanding and utilizing NDAs can be essential to your success and security.

    Read More »
    August 24, 2024 No Comments