Trademark Infringement: Meaning, Types and Remedies

trademark infringement and remedies - Intellect Vidhya Solutions

A trademark represents the goodwill and reputation of a business in the marketplace, and trademark infringement occurs when an unauthorized person uses a similar or deceptively similar trademark in order to obtain unfair benefits or take a free ride on the goodwill of the existing trademark.

What is Trademark Infringement?

Section 28 of Indian Trademark Act, 1999 discusses the rights that are vested in the registered proprietor of a trademark. It also grants the registered proprietor an exclusive right to use the trademark in relation to the goods and services in respect of which the trademark is registered, and section 29 of the act states that trademark infringement occurs when any of these rights are violated. To put it simply, trademark infringement takes place when a person other than the registered proprietor uses the exact similar or deceptively similar trademark to the registered trademark for similar goods or services without the permission of the registered proprietor in order to gain unfair advantages.

Essentials Element of Infringement

  1. Making minute alterations – Taking any key characteristic of a trademark or taking the entire mark and then making a few variations or additions would be considered trademark infringement.
  2. Use in relation with similar goods or services– The infringing mark must be utilized in relation with the similar products or services as that of the registered mark.
  3. Use in Printed form– The infringing mark has to be a printed version of the mark or a typical depiction of the mark, and it has to be on the advertisement, the invoice, or the bill. Any oral use of a registered trademark does not constitute trademark infringement.

Let’s use a landmark trademark infringement case, Starbucks Corporation v. Sardarbuksh Coffee & Co., to illustrate each of the aforementioned instances of trademark infringement. The plaintiff in this case was ‘Starbucks Coffee,’ a well-known coffee brand with outlets in practically every country, and the defendant was ‘Sardarbuksh Coffee,’ another coffee place with various outlets in Delhi. 

Satisfying the first condition, the defendants in this case clearly attempted to confuse the public by using a phonetically similar name and a similar logo with just reversing the Starbucks logo’s color scheme. (Image given below)

Secondly, the defendants were utilising the trademark in connection with identical goods and services, in this case selling coffee and associated products. Finally, the infringing mark has been used in printed form and in advertisements, satisfying all three requirements of trademark infringement.

Types of Trademark Infringement

The act of trademark infringement is divided into two categories: direct infringement and indirect infringement.

Direct Infringement

The direct infringement has been discussed under section 29 of the Act. The provision lays down a few constituent elements have to be met for direct infringement to occur, which are mentioned below:

  1. Use by an Unauthorized Person – This indicates that trademark infringement occurs when a registered trademark is used by an unauthorized person who is neither the owner nor the licensee of the mark. If the registered trademark is used with the owner’s permission, this does not constitute trademark infringement.

For instance, if you open a cosmetics and makeup store with the name “Nykaa” without obtaining a license or authorization from the owners of the mark “Nykaa,” this constitutes trademark infringement since it is an unauthorized use of the mark.

  1. Identical or Deceptively Similar Mark– A mark is regarded identical or deceptively similar to an already existing mark only if there is a possibility or likelihood of confusion among the public. 

In the recent case of In Mondelez Indian Foods Pvt. Ltd v. and Neeraj Food Products (also known as Gems v. James Bond), the Delhi High Court granted a permanent and mandatory injunction against the Defendant for retailing “James Bond,” a chocolate product that showed a deceptive similarity to Cadbury’s trademark “Gems.”

  1. Registration- It is a well- known fact that the registration of a trademark is India is not mandatory but the protection against the trademark infringement is only extended to the registered trademarks and for the unregistered trademarks the common law principle of passing off is applied.
  2. Similar class of goods/services- Before submitting a trademark application, the class of products or services offered under the trademark is selected from a total of 45 classes under the NICE classification system, and registration is done exclusively under that class or classes. Therefore, in order to demonstrate trademark infringement, the infringing mark’s class of goods or services must be identical to that of the infringed mark.

In the Indian market, for instance, the trademark ‘Red Label’ exists for both tea and alcoholic beverages, and the trademark ‘BlackBerrys’ exists for both men’s formal clothing and mobile phones, as the marks belong to separate categories of goods and services.

Indirect Infringement

There is no specific law defining or discussing the elements of an indirect infringement, but the absence of such a provision does not suggest that all parties other than the principal infringer cannot be held accountable for the infringement. Indirect infringement occurs when a third party aids or encourages the principal infringer to infringe the registered trademark. In this instance, the individual who facilitates infringing activity becomes the indirect infringer and is liable for the indirect infringement. The indirect infringement is further classified into two types-

  1. Vicarious Liability- Vicarious Liability is when an individual is held accountable for the wrongful act of others. It is commonly employed in the context of employer-employee relationships and is also specified in section 114 of the Indian Trademarks Act, 1999. It states that if a firm or company commits an offence, the entire firm will be held liable, with the exception to the individuals who committed the offence in good faith and without knowledge.

A person is vicariously liable for an offence in the following circumstances:

  • He has the direct control over the activities of the direct infringer.
  • He is aware of the infringement and nonetheless contributes to it.
  • Such infringement has benefitted him monetarily.
  1. Contributory Infringement- A person is responsible for contributory violation under the following conditions: 
  • He is aware of the trademark infringement in question.
  • He significantly contributes to direct infringement.
  • He induces the major infringer to violate the trademark.

Remedies for trademark infringement 

Civil and criminal remedies are the available remedies for trademark infringement, and the plaintiff has the option of initiating either or both of these actions against the defendants. For the purpose of infringement of an unregistered trademark the common law remedy of passing- off can be invoked.

Civil Remedies

The civil remedies available in case of trademark infringement are as mentioned:

  1. Damages

The damages in the form of compensation are provided to the plaintiff or the owner of the registered trademark by the infringer.

  1. Accounts of profit

Any profit gained by the infringer while using the trademark of another registered owner, all the profit or certain amount of monetarily compensation  is delivered to the owner of Trademark.

  1. Destruction of goods 

The court may issue and order of destruction or eradication of all the goods or products manufactured using the infringed mark.

  1. Injunction

Injunction is an action that prohibits unofficial or unauthorized use of TM. The court grants protection to the trademark owner by preventing the infringer from further using the infringed mark.

The injunction order can be of four types:

  • Anton Piller Order- the Anton Piller Injunction order is an ex-parte order which is issued to inspect the premises of the defendant without giving any prior notice.
  • Mareva Injunction- when the court prohibits defendants from using their assets within the court’s jurisdiction until the conclusion of the trial.
  • Interlocutory Injunction or temporary injunction- entails the prohibition of an action by a party to a lawsuit until the case is resolved.
  • Permanent or perpetual injunction- It is a court order requiring an individual or company to permanently refrain from engaging in specific activities.
  1. Cost of proceedings- 

The court can order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings of the plaintiff.

Criminal Remedies

The criminal remedies available in case of trademark infringement are as follows:

  • With a prison term that should not be less than six months and can be extended to three years; 
  • With a fine that should not be less than 50,000 rupees and can be extended to two lakh rupees.

Conclusion

A trademark carries huge weight and is valued because it has a company’s reputation associated with it. Unfortunately, such success & popularity amongst the consumer base can have negative consequences too, trademark infringement being one of them. Deceptively similar marks can be used by either businesses to divert consumer traffic to their outlets or by counterfeiters to sell fake products as the real deal. This can become a problem since the average customer may get fooled and the original company may get blamed. In order to curb this menace, it is important to understand the trademark infringement, the way it happens, its nature to transcend borders and how one can take steps to curb trademark infringement.

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp

Categories

Search

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • All Post
    • Copyright
    • Design Patents
    • Patent Filing
    • Patent Search
    • Trademark

    Related Posts

    Food Plating and Copyright Protection in India

    Food plating — the positioning and presentation of food on a plate has matured into its own craft; showcasing chefs around the globe serving up more than just taste alone. In addition to aesthetics, it sets up your dining experience and reflect the brand identity of a restaurant. Chefs and restaurateurs have resorted to intellectual property (IP) law in different countries around the world, for protecting their unique forms of plating. But in India, copyright law does not allow for food plating to be protected easily: the same is because of two key reasons; firstly, food being highly perishable items and secondly primary purpose of using dishes as they serve a functional role. This article takes a closer look at the intersection of Indian copyright law and food plating, covering eligibility requirements and mechanisms for protection as well as some significant challenges. Copyright Eligibility for Food Plating in India Under the Copyright Act of 1957, copyright protection in India applies to original works of art, literature, music, and more. For a work to be eligible, it generally must meet two main requirements: However, Indian Copyright Law does not automatically deem the plating of food copyrightable. Chefs have no immediate legal protection for their plating, but by photographing it they can at least preserve the creative arrangement in a fixed medium. This approach means the copyright is granted to the photograph or video itself—not the plated arrangement—which still presents some limitations but can deter unauthorized reproduction of the image. Protecting Food Plating in India: Alternative Approaches Despite the challenges, several IP options could provide indirect protection for food plating in India: Key Challenges in Achieving Copyright Protection for Food Plating Even with these alternatives, protecting food plating remains challenging in India for several reasons: Practical Recommendations for  Chefs and Restaurateurs For chefs and restaurant owners in India interested in protecting their food plating styles, here are some practical steps that can help: Conclusion Food presentation does not enjoy copyright protection in India, as food is transient (disappearing after a meal), functional, and perishable. Although food plating does not fall under the traditional copyright regime, chefs or restaurateurs can explore other methods—such as photographic copyright, branding protections, contractual protections, and trade dress—to safeguard their culinary creations’ presentation. While these solutions provide some level of protection, they ultimately highlight the issue that, in the Indian legal context, food plating lacks force under copyright law. If chefs hope to protect their plating artistry in India, the key is to focus on brand-building and be inventive with alternative IP protections.

    Read More »
    November 11, 2024 No Comments
    The principle of 'Continuous Use' in Trademark Law - Intellect Vidhya

    The principle of ‘Continuous Use’ in Trademark Law

    While talking about Trademark law regime, the principle of ‘continuous use’ plays a crucial role in shaping the validity and enforceability of trademark rights. In India, similar to many other jurisdictions, one of the most known ways to establish the exclusive rights over a trademark is through continuous and consistent usage of the mark in commerce or in course of trade. Even if the formal registration is not granted, a trademark can still be protected based on its consistent use in the market. This article explores the principle of continuous use under Indian trademark law, its significance, and how it impacts the protection and enforcement of trademarks. What is the Principle of Continuous Use? The principle of continuous use in trademark law refers to the long and consistent use of a trademark by its owner in the course of trade in business. The continuous and uninterrupted use of the trademark assists in establishing the goodwill and reputation of the brand in the market. The older a trademark, the greater its reputation and goodwill. The Trademarks Act, 1999, acknowledges the importance of continuous use by offering protection to both registered and unregistered trademarks. The primary aim of this principle is to ensure that the rights over a trademark belong to the entity that has genuinely used the mark in commerce over time. The Legal Foundation of Continuous Use in India According to Indian trademark law, Section 34 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, addresses the principle of continuous use, highlighting the concept of “prior use.” This section states that a registered trademark owner cannot prevent any individual or business from continuing to use a mark if they have been using it consistently since before the trademark was registered. This provision is crucial as it emphasises use rather than registration. This means that even if a third party registers a trademark, the party that has been using the mark continuously for the longest time holds superior rights to it. Key Points of Section 34: Importance of Continuous Use 1. Establishing Priority Continuous use plays a crucial role in establishing priority over a trademark. If there is a conflict in rights, the trademark used earlier and without interruption has better rights to claim its use over that of the owner if it contrasts with the registered trademark holder. This is especially relevant in India, where the “first-to-use” principle precedes the common law concept of a “First-to-file”. 2. Preventing Abandonment This continuous use will prevent the trademark from being deemed abandoned. Failure to use a trademark without proper reason over an extended period may lead the authorities to declare it abandoned, and as such lose its rights. According to Indian trademark law, a mark needs to be used continuously in trade so as to retain its enforceability. Failure to do so can open the door for third parties to challenge the ownership of the trademark. 3. Reputation and Goodwill The longer you use a trademark, the more related goodwill and recognition will be gained that are important elements for every brand. A business expands sufficient identity allowing consumers to relate the brand with quality, trustworthiness or in a specific product or service. A trademark that has been used continuously over time under Indian law may qualify as a “well-known trademark” and receive additional protection, even in categories where it is not even directly used. 4. Protection for Unregistered Trademarks In the case of unregistered trademarks, continuous use is especially important. While unregistered marks are not protected under the Indian Trademarks Act, they may still be safeguarded by utilizing English common law rights called “passing off.” In as action of passing off, long time use would help the plaintiff establish that their mark has gathered good will and that the defendant’s use of a similar mark would likely deceive consumers and cause harm to their business. Proving Continuous Use Having continuous use and proving the same are two different things. Mentioned below are the kinds of documents that can be furnished in order to prove the continuous use of a particular trademark: Challenges to Continuous Use While continuous use is a strong principle in Indian trademark law, it does come with certain challenges: Relevant Case Laws The Supreme Court made clear that the rights of prior users are stronger than trademark registration. So just because a trademark is registered does not mean the original user of that domain cannot infringe on your rights. The court decided in Peps’ favour, indicating that a mark can still receive protection even if it is descriptive, provided it has acquired distinctiveness through ongoing use. Conclusion The principle of continuous use serves as a fundamental aspect of trademark law in India, offering protection to businesses that have consistently used their trademarks over the years, regardless of registration status. It ensures that the true owner of a trademark is the one who has consistently utilised it in commerce, rather than simply the one who registered it first. Indian trademark law seeks to promote fairness and preserve the goodwill that businesses build around their brands by emphasising use rather than formal registration. It is essential for both businesses and individuals to consistently use their trademarks in order to protect their rights and avoid potential legal conflicts.

    Read More »
    October 28, 2024 No Comments
    Work for Hire in the IP World Copyright and Patents - Intellect Vidhya

    Work for Hire in the IP World: Copyright and Patents

    When it comes to the creation of Intellectual property the concept of “work for hire” plays a pivotal role, especially in the domains of copyright and patent law. This legal principle determines who holds the ownership of intellectual property created in the course of employment or under a contractual agreement. While the idea of “work for hire” may seem straightforward, its implications can be complex and vary significantly between different types of IP, such as copyrights and patents. This article explores the concept of “work for hire” in the context of Indian law and how it affects ownership and rights related to copyright and patents. What is “Work for Hire”? The concept of “work for hire” refers to a situation where a person or entity, typically an employer or contractor, hires an individual (an employee or an independent contractor) to create a specific piece of intellectual property, and as a result, the ownership of the work is automatically assigned to the hiring party. In the Indian IP context, work for hire influences two major areas: 1. Copyrights (for creative works like writings, music, films, software, etc.) 2. Patents (for inventions and innovations). The way “work for hire” operates under Indian law differs slightly in each of these categories, and understanding these distinctions is crucial for creators, employers, and businesses alike. Work for Hire in Indian Copyright Law Legal Framework In India, copyright is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957. Under this Act, the principle of “work for hire” is enshrined in Section 17, which deals with the ownership of copyright. Generally, the author or creator of a work is the first owner of the copyright. However, there are exceptions to this rule, one of the most significant being works created under employment or commission, which are considered “works for hire.” Ownership of Copyright According to Section 17 of the Copyright Act, the employer or commissioning party will be the first owner of the copyright in the following cases: 1. In the Course of Employment: If a work is created by an employee in the course of their employment, the employer is deemed the first owner of the copyright, unless there is an agreement to the contrary.   2. Commissioned Work: If a work is created on commission for a specific purpose, the party commissioning the work will own the copyright unless there is an agreement to the contrary. In the case Khemraj Shrikrishnadass v. M/s Garg & Co., the court addressed the issue of copyright ownership concerning work for hire under Indian law. The court held that in the absence of a contract stating otherwise, when an author creates a work at the request of another party for remuneration, the copyright typically passes to the person who commissioned the work. This reinforces the general principle that unless an explicit contract exists, the employer or commissioner becomes the first owner of the copyright in such works created during employment or as commissioned assignments. Moral Rights Even though the employer or commissioning party owns the copyright, the creator still retains moral rights under Indian law, including the right to claim authorship and prevent modifications that could harm the creator’s reputation. Work for Hire in Indian Patent Law Legal Framework In India, patent rights are governed by the Patents Act, 1970. Unlike copyright, where the work-for-hire principle is relatively clear, patent law presents a more nuanced situation. Ownership of a patent typically depends on the terms of employment and whether the invention was created within the scope of the inventor’s duties. Ownership of Patents There is no automatic “work for hire” rule for patents in India as there is in copyright law. Instead, the inventor is considered the “first owner” of the patent and the ownership of inventions depends on the terms of the employment contract or a specific assignment agreement. This means that while an employee is the actual inventor, ownership of the patent can only be transferred to the employer through a written contract or agreement. Furthermore, there is always a separate debate about the inventions created by the employee during the course of employment and since the inventor (employee in this case) is the first owner of the patents the Employers are advised to always execute a assignment agreement in place. 1. In the Course of Employment: If an employee invents something as part of their job duties (e.g., researchers, engineers), the employer generally owns the patent subject to the assignment agreement. 2. Outside Employment Duties: If an employee invents something unrelated to their job description and outside the use of company resources, the employee may have the right to the patent. The case of Darius Rutton Kavasmaneck v. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. (2014) revolves around a dispute concerning intellectual property rights in the context of patent law and “work for hire.” The case involved the question of whether the inventions and patents developed by Kavasmaneck, a key employee of Gharda Chemicals, belonged to him individually or to the company. The court ruled in favor of Gharda Chemicals, affirming that the inventions created by Kavasmaneck during his tenure with the company fell under the “work for hire” doctrine, as they were made in the course of his employment and used the company’s resources. This case highlights the importance of employment agreements and the principle that inventions made by employees in the scope of their work duties are typically owned by the employer Comparing Copyright and Patent Work for Hire While the concept of work for hire is prevalent in both copyright and patent law, there are some key differences: 1. Automatic Ownership:    – In copyright, the employer or commissioner is typically the automatic owner unless there is an agreement to the contrary.    – In patent law, ownership depends on the employment context and the existence of a clear agreement, as the inventor is the first and original owner by default. 2.   Scope of Work:    – In   copyright, almost any work created within the course of employment may fall under work

    Read More »
    October 28, 2024 No Comments
    Copyright Protection for Sound Recordings - Intellect Vidhya

    Understanding Copyright for Sound Recordings

    Copyright for sound recordings is a vital aspect of intellectual property law, protecting the rights of creators and ensuring they maintain control over their work. Sound recordings, whether they are music tracks, podcasts, or other audio forms, are protected by copyright, granting the owner exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and publicly perform the work. This article will walk you through the basics of sound recording copyright: what it protects, how a traditional right has evolved into an increasingly important one in digital times and how digital distribution impacts your copyright rights. What is Copyright for Sound Recordings? Copyright for sound recordings refers to the legal protection granted to the specific performance or recording of a sound. This protection is separate from the copyright in the underlying musical composition or lyrics — it covers only the actual recorded sounds. For example, when an artist records a song, the sound recording copyright protects that particular recorded version while composition of music and lyrics are protected by means of their own copyright. Copyright owners of sound recordings have several exclusive rights, including: These rights allow creators to determine how their recordings can be used and for which they will receive royalties if others use the work. Duration of Copyright Protection for Sound Recordings The Copyright Act, 1957 of India governs protection duration for copyright in sound recordings. In India, sound recordings are protected for a period of 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which such recording is published. This is also in line with the international framework that India has subscribed to, as a member of Berne Convention. As a result of this protection, sound recordings in India are given a standardised period of copyright that may be slightly different from other jurisdictions but one which generally ensures the robust protection to creative works. How Digital Distribution Impacts Your Copyright Rights? The digital environment has transformed the manner in which sound recordings are distributed and includes online platforms (e.g., streaming, downloads) and social media. This has led to many new opportunities for creators, and at the same time created more complications in copyright clearance. Digital distribution impacts your copyright rights in several ways: The Role of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) Collective Management Organizations (CMOs), also known as Performing Rights Organizations (PROs), also have a major role in taking care of the Copyright for sound recordings. These organizations collect royalties on behalf of copyright owners when their recordings are played publicly, whether on the radio, in public spaces, or online. Joining a CMO gives creators protection in the form to get paid for using their recordings. They support the enforcement of copyright by monitoring usage, and acting against not authorised uses on behalf of their members Copyright Infringement and Remedies Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses a sound recording without permission, violating the copyright holder’s exclusive rights. Infringement can take many forms, including unauthorized copying, distribution, or public performance of the recording. When infringement occurs, copyright holders have several remedies available: Conclusion Sound recording copyright is an essential tool to defend the interests of its creators as it allows control and benefit their productions. With the evolution of digital distribution, it has become even more critical to understand how here-to-for basic principles affect your copyright rights. Keeping up to date about your entitlements, using copyright aids and working with CMOs will enable creators in their quest to protect against unauthorised use of sound recordings.

    Read More »
    August 28, 2024 No Comments