Unconventional Trademarks In India

In the realm of intellectual property rights and trademarks, the term “unconventional trademarks” has emerged as a captivating and evolving concept. These marks defy traditional definitions, often blurring the lines between what is considered standard and what is extraordinary. In India, where innovation knows no bounds, unconventional trademarks are gaining prominence, and they are shaping the future of branding and intellectual property protection. In this article, we delve into the world of unconventional trademarks, their types, famous examples, registration challenges, and the current legal status in India.

Understanding Unconventional Trademarks

Unconventional trademarks, often referred to as non-conventional trademarks, diverge from the standard or traditional forms of trademarks we are familiar with, including logos, brand names, or slogans. These non-traditional trademarks are usually linked to human sensory experiences and perceptions, such as smell or taste marks, which can only be perceived by humans. That is not it, there are various other types of unconventional trademarks, let’s understand each one in detail.

  1. Sound Marks: These trademarks are characterized by a sequence of musical notes, distinctive sound patterns, or memorable jingles. A prime example is the iconic Nokia tune, instantly recognizable by its distinctive sound.
  2. Color Marks: These trademarks are defined by a specific color or a unique combination of colors associated with a product or service. A renowned instance is the use of a particular shade of pink for Owens-Corning insulation, making it a well-established color mark.
  3. Shape Marks: These marks pertain to the three-dimensional form of a product or its packaging. An illustrative example is the distinctive shape of the Coca-Cola bottle, which has become a timeless symbol in the world of branding.
  4. Taste Marks: Taste marks are based on the unique flavor or taste of a product. For example, a specific blend of herbs and spices in a seasoning mix.
  5. Smell Marks: Smell trademarks are based on specific scents or fragrances associated with a product or brand. Perfumes, scented candles, and aromatic products often rely on smell marks.
  6. Motion Marks: Motion marks involve dynamic movement, often seen in animated logos or specific sequences of motion. An iconic motion mark is the roaring lion featured in the MGM logo, instantly evoking a sense of cinematic grandeur.
  7. Position Marks: These trademarks define the specific placement or positioning of a sign on a product or its packaging. An emblematic instance is the strategic location of the Mercedes-Benz logo, typically positioned on the front grille of the car.
  8. Hologram Marks: Hologram marks utilize holographic images that exhibit change or movement when viewed from varying angles, adding a futuristic and captivating dimension to branding.

Challenges in registering Unconventional Marks in India

The process of registering unconventional trademarks in India presents a multitude of challenges, primarily centred around the requirement of graphical representation. According to Section 2(zb) of the Trademarks Act, 1999, a trademark is explicitly defined as “a mark capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others ” This definition implies that a trademark should have a visual or graphic element that can be replicated in tangible or digital forms, and it must be distinct and easily distinguishable.

  1. Graphical representation

Sound Marks, representing a series of musical notes, jingles, or distinctive sound patterns, indeed pose a challenge in terms of graphical representation. However, it’s worth noting that they can be represented by notating the musical notes or providing a detailed description of the sound. In India, sound marks enjoy a relatively smoother registration process compared to other unconventional trademarks due to this capacity for graphical representation.

Color marks, despite their visual distinctiveness, pose difficulties due to the subjective nature of color perception, making the replication of precise shades or combinations in graphical form imprecise. Three-dimensional shape marks, exemplified by iconic designs like the Coca-Cola bottle, resist easy graphical representation as the intricate details often elude accurate capture in two dimensions. Further, presenting smell and taste marks graphically is challenging due to their non-visual nature and the subjective, complex, and evolving aspects of these sensory experiences. Motion marks, with their dynamic movements, can lose their essence when translated into static graphics, a challenge faced by animated logos. Marks defined by precise positioning on products or packaging, though distinctive, struggle to find precise graphical equivalents. Furthermore, taste, texture, and hologram marks, involving sensory and three-dimensional experiences, challenge conventional graphic representation methods.

  1. Distinctiveness

Furthermore, the requirement of distinctiveness introduces an additional layer of complexity. Unconventional marks, given their nature, may not inherently exhibit this distinctiveness. As mentioned earlier, many unconventional marks are linked to human sensory experiences and perceptions. Since human memory is imperfect, people might struggle to recall or could easily confuse such marks with others from different sources. This underscores the necessity to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness through extensive use and recognition in the market. The convergence of these factors collectively creates substantial obstacles in the registration of unconventional trademarks in India.

However, India is gradually adapting to the evolving landscape of unconventional trademarks. The judiciary and the Intellectual Property Office have recognized the importance of these marks in contemporary branding. Notable cases have set a precedent for the registration of unconventional marks, emphasizing the need for flexibility in interpretation.

For instance, the distinctive sound of a Harley-Davidson motorcycle’s engine was recognized as a sound mark. Similarly, the 3D shape of the Kit-Kat chocolate bar was registered as a shape mark.

Way Forward

As the world of branding continues to innovate and push boundaries, the concept of unconventional trademarks in India is expected to gain further recognition and acceptance. Brands will continue to explore new avenues of trademark protection, and the legal framework will likely adapt to accommodate these changes.

In conclusion, unconventional trademarks have transformed the way we perceive and protect intellectual property. While registering these marks may pose unique challenges due to the requirement of graphical representation and distinctiveness, the significance of well-known status and evolving legal frameworks in India offer hope for brand owners. 

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are non-traditional marks in India?

Non-traditional marks in India encompass sound, color, shape, and motion marks, which deviate from standard text and logo trademarks.

  1. What are conventional marks?

Conventional marks refer to traditional symbols, logos, or brand names commonly used for trademark registration. These are standard forms of trademarks.

  1. What are distinctive marks examples?

Distinctive mark examples include the Apple logo, Nike’s swoosh symbol, and the Coca-Cola brand name, which are easily recognizable and associated with specific companies or products.

  1. What is an unconventional form of trademark?

An unconventional form of trademark includes unique elements like sound patterns, specific product shapes, or non-standard visual representations, which depart from traditional textual or graphical trademarks.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Categories

Search

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • All Post
    • Copyright
    • Design Patents
    • Patent Filing
    • Patent Search
    • Trademark

    Related Posts

    The Role of Design Patents in Enhancing Brand Value in India - Intellect Vidhya

    The Role of Design Patents in Enhancing Brand Value in India

    In today’s highly competitive marketplace, businesses are constantly seeking ways to differentiate themselves from their competitors and establish a strong brand identity. One strategic tool that companies can leverage to achieve this goal is the design patent. Design patents, which protect the ornamental or aesthetic features of a product, can play a crucial role in enhancing brand value and fostering customer recognition and loyalty. How Design Patents Contribute to Brand Differentiation Examples of Brands That Have Leveraged Design Patents Effectively These examples demonstrate how design patents can serve as a powerful tool for brands to differentiate themselves in the marketplace, establish a unique visual identity, and enhance their overall brand value and recognition. By protecting their distinctive product designs through patents, these companies have created iconic and instantly recognizable products that resonate with consumers and contribute to their brand’s success and positioning. Tips for Using Design Patents as a Marketing Tool Conclusion In the highly competitive Indian market, design patents can be a powerful tool for companies seeking to enhance their brand value and establish a unique identity. By leveraging the exclusivity and distinctiveness offered by design patents, brands can differentiate themselves, foster consumer recognition, and ultimately strengthen their competitive position in the marketplace. The examples provided above showcase how design patents can be effectively utilized to create visually distinct and memorable products that resonate with consumers and contribute to brand recognition and loyalty. By incorporating design patents into their marketing and branding strategies, companies can elevate their brand’s perceived value, differentiate themselves from competitors, and cultivate a loyal customer base that appreciates and recognizes the uniqueness of their offerings.

    Read More »
    May 24, 2024 No Comments
    Recent Trends in Patent Filing in India Conventional and National Phase Routes

    Recent Trends in Patent Filing in India: Conventional and National Phase Routes

    The landscape of patent filing in India has witnessed significant changes over recent years, influenced by global economic shifts, advancements in technology, and evolving legal frameworks. Two primary routes dominate the patent filing process in India: the conventional route and the national phase route under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Understanding recent trends in these routes provides valuable insights for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. Conventional Route Trends The conventional route, which involves filing a patent application directly with the Indian Patent Office within 12 months of the priority date, has seen a steady increase in activity. This route is often favoured by domestic applicants and businesses seeking to protect innovations promptly within the country. Growth in Domestic Applications: There has been a noticeable rise in patent applications from Indian inventors and small to medium enterprises (SMEs). This trend is fuelled by increased awareness of intellectual property rights and government initiatives such as the “Startup India” campaign, which offers reduced filing fees for startups. Technological Advancements: Sectors like biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, information technology, and artificial intelligence have dominated recent filings. Innovations in these areas reflect India’s growing prowess in high-tech and research-driven industries. Streamlined Processes: The Indian Patent Office has made efforts to streamline the patent examination process, reducing the time taken to grant patents. Initiatives like the expedited examination for startups and the electronic filing system have contributed to more efficient processing of applications. National Phase Route Trends The national phase route, allowing international applicants to enter India’s patent system under the PCT within 31 months from the priority date, continues to be a popular choice for foreign entities seeking protection in India. Increase in International Filings: India’s robust market potential and favourable IP environment have led to an increase in national phase entries. Companies from the United States, Europe, Japan, and China are prominent users of this route, reflecting India’s importance as a key market for global innovation. Diverse Technological Domains: Similar to the conventional route, the national phase route has seen a surge in applications in advanced technology sectors. Notably, there has been significant activity in renewable energy technologies, medical devices, and consumer electronics. Legal and Regulatory Developments: Recent amendments in Indian patent laws, aimed at harmonizing with international standards, have made the national phase route more attractive. The introduction of measures like the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) with Japan has facilitated faster processing of applications, thereby encouraging more international filings. Analysis of recent filing trends for both routes Recent filing trends for patents in India, through both the conventional and national phase routes, indicate a robust growth in domestic and international patent activity. The conventional route has seen a rise in applications from Indian inventors and SMEs, spurred by government initiatives and heightened IP awareness, with notable filings in biotechnology, IT, and AI sectors. Concurrently, the national phase route under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) has attracted increasing international interest, particularly from the US, Europe, Japan, and China, driven by India’s expanding market potential and improved regulatory environment. Technological advancements and streamlined processes, such as expedited examinations and electronic filing, have further enhanced the appeal of patenting in India. Impact of technological advancements on filing strategies Technological advancements are significantly reshaping patent filing strategies, compelling inventors and companies to adopt more sophisticated and proactive approaches. The rise of cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and renewable energy has led to a surge in complex and interdisciplinary inventions, necessitating comprehensive prior art searches and strategic global filings to secure broad and robust protection. Additionally, advancements in digital tools and patent analytics enable applicants to identify optimal filing routes, anticipate market trends, and streamline the drafting and submission processes. As a result, the integration of technology into IP management not only enhances the efficiency and precision of patent filings but also strengthens the strategic positioning of patents in a competitive marketplace. Predictions for future trends in patent filings Future trends in patent filings are likely to be characterized by an increasing emphasis on emerging technologies and sustainability. Innovations in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and green technologies are expected to dominate patent landscapes, driven by ongoing research and global efforts to address environmental challenges. Additionally, the patent filing process will continue to evolve with advancements in digital tools, such as AI-powered patent analytics and blockchain for secure and transparent IP management, making the process more efficient and accessible. Geographic trends may also shift, with developing countries like India and China playing a more prominent role in global patent activity. As businesses and inventors seek to protect their innovations in a rapidly changing world, strategic, international, and collaborative patent filings will become increasingly crucial. Challenges and Opportunities Despite the positive trends, several challenges remain. The backlog of pending applications, although reduced, still poses a hurdle. Additionally, ensuring consistent quality in patent examination is critical as the volume of applications grows. However, these challenges also present opportunities. Continued investments in digitization, capacity building within the Patent Office, and fostering a more innovation-friendly ecosystem can further enhance India’s position as a global patent filing destination. Conclusion The evolving landscape of patent filing in India, encompassing both the conventional and national phase routes, highlights a dynamic interplay between domestic innovation and international interest. The conventional route has become increasingly popular among Indian inventors and SMEs, driven by government initiatives and a growing awareness of intellectual property rights. Meanwhile, the national phase route under the PCT attracts substantial international filings, reflecting India’s significance as a key market for global innovation. Technological advancements are reshaping filing strategies, enabling more efficient and strategic patent management. Future trends are expected to focus on emerging technologies and sustainability, with India poised to play an even more prominent role in the global patent arena. While challenges such as application backlogs and quality consistency remain, they also present opportunities for further improvements. By continuing to invest in digitization and capacity building, India can enhance its position as a leading destination for patent filings, benefiting inventors

    Read More »
    May 15, 2024 No Comments
    NBA Approval for Patent Application - What, When, Who, Why, and How - Intellect Vidhya

    NBA Approval for Patent Application – What, When, Who, Why, and How?

    What is NBA? NBA stands for National Biodiversity Association which is a statutory body that was established in 2003 by the Central government for the purpose of the Biological diversity Act, 2002 to regulate access and equitable sharing of benefits arising from any biological resources. What is a Biological Resource? As per Section 2(c) of the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act (BDA), 2023, “biological resources” includes plants, animals, micro-organisms or parts of their genetic material and derivatives (excluding value added products) with actual or potential use or value but does not include human genetic material wherein “derivative” means a naturally occurring biochemical compound or metabolism of biological resources, even if it does not contain functional units of heredity. When Do We Need NBA Approval? It is mandatory to apply for NBA approval under BDA 2002 through Form 3 with appropriate fee (INR 500) before patent application in or outside India under the following condition: The NBA approval shall be obtained prior to the grant of the Patent provided that the NBA shall dispose of the application for permission made to it within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt thereof. In case of foreign jurisdiction, NBA approval shall be granted only to those countries that are intimated in the Form 3. Relevant Sections (1A) Any person applying for any intellectual property right, by whatever name called, in or outside India, for any invention based on any research or information on a biological resource which is accessed from India, including those deposited in repositories outside India, or traditional knowledge associated thereto, shall register with the National Biodiversity Authority before grant of such intellectual property rights. (1B) Any person who has obtained intellectual property right, by whatever name called, in or outside India, for any invention based on any research or information on a biological resource which is accessed from India, including those deposited in repositories outside India, or traditional knowledge associated thereto, shall obtain prior approval of the National Biodiversity Authority at the time of commercialization. When Do We Not Need NBA Approval? NBA approval is not required in following cases: Relevant Section & Definitions Why Should Apply For NBA Approval? The following applicants should apply for NBA approval before patent application disclosing biological resources from India: Why To Disclose Biological Resource & Apply For NBA Approval? The National Biodiversity Authority may, while granting the approval under section 6(2) of BDA, 2002, impose benefit sharing fee or royalty or both or impose conditions including the sharing of financial benefits arising out of the commercial utilization of such rights from biological resources. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 has a penal provision in this regard under section 55 (1) which provides that “whoever contravenes or attempts to contravene or abets the contravention of the provisions of the section 3 or section 4 or section 6 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees and where the damage caused exceeds ten lakh rupees such fine may commensurate with the damage caused, or with both.” If the complete specification does not disclose or wrongly mentions the biological material source and geographical origin, then, according to clause (j) of Sections 25(1) and 25(2) respectively of the Patents Act, 1970, it will create a ground for pre and post-grant opposition. If NBA approval is not obtained/submitted, a controller can file an objection in the examination report. Even if one did not raise the complaint during the examination process, it could be brought subsequently. How To Apply For NBA Approval? For the sake of patent application, a person seeking approval from the NBA must make an application on NBA Form 3 through ABS (Access and Benefit Sharing) e-filing with INR 500 as a fee. The particulars that are required for Form 3 application is given below: 1. Full particulars of the applicant including (a) Name of the applicant (s) as indicated in the IPR application submitted to the Patent Office. (b) Complete address of the applicant (s) with state/province name/country and PIN code/zip code, Telephone/ Fax Number (Land line with code), Mobile Number and Email address. (c) Complete professional profile or bio-data of the applicant (s) not exceeding one page. (d) Bona fide letter in original from the institution or organisation with whom the applicant (s) is affiliated. 2. Details of the invention on which IPRs sought including (a) Full and exact title and abstract of IPR on which application is made. (b) Patent office reference number, if application is filed before the Patent Office. 3. Details of the biological resources and or/associated knowledge used in the invention including (a) Scientific name(s) of the biological resource(s) (b) common name(s) of the biological resource(s) (c) Details of associated knowledge used and source of such information, if applicable. (d) Provide copy of approval of NBA for access to biological resources and/ or associated knowledge (if the applicant is covered under Section 3(2) of BD Act) 4. Geographical location from where the biological resources used in the invention are collected (a) Indicate the name of village, panchayat, block, taluk, district and state from where the biological resource(s) were collected. (b) If the biological resource(s) were collected or procured from the Institute/ Organization/ Company/local trader/individual, provide exact contact details (address and phone number) of such supplier and invoice/evidence for such purchase. (c) Indicate whether the material was sourced from wild/cultivated 5. Details of any traditional knowledge used in the invention and any identified individual/ community holding the traditional knowledge (a) Provide full details of individual/communities holding such traditional knowledge (b) In case, this knowledge sourced from texts provide source of such information (photocopies of relevant information may be attached wherever applicable) 6. Details of Institution where Research and Development Activities carried out (a) Name and address of the institute where research was carried out. (b) Please provide details of collaboration with other institutions/organization/company, if any, during the course of research activities. 7. Details

    Read More »
    May 15, 2024 No Comments
    Ideas vs Expression The Fundamental Divide in Copyright Law - Intellect Vidhya

    Ideas vs Expression: The Fundamental Divide in Copyright Law

    Copyright law is a fine balance, striving to encourage and safeguard creative expression while also allowing ideas and concepts to be freely accessible for others to expand upon. The core of this equilibrium is rooted in the essential differentiation between concepts and their manifestation – a principle that has influenced the field of copyright law for generations. The Idea/Expression Dichotomy The concept of the idea/expression dichotomy is a widely recognised principle in copyright law that distinguishes between the conceptual aspects of a work and their physical representation. Essentially, it acknowledges that although ideas cannot be copyrighted, the unique way in which those ideas are expressed can be legally protected. This dichotomy serves several important purposes. First and foremost, it safeguards the free flow of ideas, which are considered the building blocks of human progress and innovation. By preventing the monopolization of ideas, copyright law fosters a vibrant marketplace of creative discourse, where ideas can be freely explored, debated, and built upon. Furthermore, the idea/expression divide recognises the inherent restriction of copyright. It does not encompass abstract concepts or principles, but rather centres on the concrete, unique expression of those concepts. This ensures that copyright safeguards the creator’s distinct contribution while still allowing others to derive inspiration from the fundamental concepts and produce their own innovative creations. Defining Ideas and Expression But what constitutes an “idea” versus an “expression” can often be a complex and nuanced determination. In general, ideas are considered the foundational concepts, principles, themes, or plots that form the basis of a work. These may include scientific theories, historical facts, philosophical musings, or broad narrative premises. Expression, on the other hand, refers to the specific way in which those ideas are articulated, manifested, or conveyed. It encompasses the author’s unique selection, arrangement, and synthesis of words, images, sounds, or other elements that give tangible form to the underlying idea. For example, the idea of a young wizard attending a school for magic cannot be copyrighted, as it is a broad premise or concept. However, the specific characters, settings, plotlines, and descriptive language used in a book like “Harry Potter” would constitute the protectable expression of that idea. Merging and Scènes à Faire While the idea/expression dichotomy provides a guiding principle, its application can be challenging, particularly when ideas and expression become closely intertwined or when certain elements are dictated by external constraints or conventions. The “merger doctrine” addresses situations where an idea can only be expressed in a limited number of ways, essentially merging the idea and expression. In such cases, copyright protection may be limited or absent, as granting a monopoly over the expression would effectively grant a monopoly over the idea itself. Similarly, the “scènes à faire” doctrine recognizes that certain elements or scenes may be inherent to a particular genre or setting and are therefore not protectable as original expression. For instance, a romantic comedy might include common tropes or scenarios that are expected within the genre, and these would not be considered protectable elements. Evolving Challenges in the Digital Age The advent of new technologies and digital media has introduced additional complexities to the idea/expression divide. Software code, for instance, straddles the line between functional ideas and creative expression, presenting challenges in determining the appropriate scope of copyright protection. Similarly, the proliferation of user-generated content and remix culture has brought renewed focus on the boundaries between transformative expression and unauthorized derivative works. As the creative landscape continues to evolve, courts, legislators, and intellectual property experts must continually refine and adapt the application of the idea/expression dichotomy to address emerging issues while preserving the fundamental principles of copyright law. Conclusion The idea/expression dichotomy is a cornerstone of copyright law, striking a delicate balance between incentivizing creative expression and maintaining a vibrant public domain of ideas. While its application can be nuanced and context-specific, this fundamental principle remains essential for fostering innovation, safeguarding free speech, and promoting the progress of knowledge and creativity. 

    Read More »
    April 17, 2024 No Comments