Well-known Trademarks in India

In today’s interconnected world, trademarks play a crucial role in differentiating products and services while also functioning as valuable business assets. Among the various types of trademarks, well-known trademarks occupy an exclusive spot. Well-known marks are the marks that have achieved exceptional recognition and reputation, transcending geographic boundaries. India, with its rich trademark jurisprudence, recognizes the significance of well-known trademarks and has put in place legal provisions to ensure their protection. In this article, we will delve into what well-known trademarks are, discuss the legal provisions, and shed light on the filing procedure.

What is a Well- Known Trademark?

A well-known trademark, also known as a “famous trademark,” is a mark that has garnered substantial public recognition and favour. These trademarks are readily distinguishable and are strongly associated with a particular brand or product. They have expanded their influence outside of their respective industries, garnering recognition in a variety of fields. Companies place a high value on their well-known trademarks and afford them extensive legal protection.

Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 defines “well-known trade mark”, “in relation to any goods or services, means a mark which has become so to the substantial segment of the public which uses such goods or receives such services that the use of such mark in relation to other goods or services would be likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade or rendering of services between those goods or services and a person using the mark in relation to the first-mentioned goods or services.”

Examples of Famous Trademarks

  • Google: As the world’s leading search engine, Google has become synonymous with internet searching. It’s simple and colourful logo is instantly recognizable.
  • Nike: The Nike swoosh is an iconic symbol in the sports and apparel industry. Nike’s “Just Do It” slogan is also widely recognized and associated with athleticism.
  • Amazon: The smiling arrow from Amazon’s logo represents customer satisfaction. Amazon’s e-commerce platform is used by millions worldwide, and its services extend beyond online shopping.
  • Ferrari: The prancing horse emblem of Ferrari is synonymous with luxury sports cars. Ferrari is known for its high-performance vehicles.

Deciding Factors for well-known trademarks

To determine the eligibility of a trademark for well-known status in India under Section 11(6) of the Trademarks Act, 1999, specific criteria must be met:

  • The trademark must have achieved a high level of recognition and goodwill among the relevant section of the public, including knowledge in India obtained through promotional efforts.
  • The trademark’s use should be substantial and consistent over time, with a wide geographical presence.
  • The trademark’s promotional efforts, such as advertising, publicity, and presentations at fairs or exhibitions, should be extensive in scope.
  • The duration and geographical area of trademark registration or application for registration under the Act reflect the use and recognition of the trademark.
  • A successful record of enforcing the rights associated with the trademark, including recognition as a well-known mark by courts or Registrars, is a crucial factor.

Filing Procedure for Well-Known Trademarks

Rule 124 of the Trademark Rules, 2017, provides the process for filing a well-known trademark in India. This process involves the following steps:

  1. Filing an application

Any interested party can submit an application online by filling out Form TM-M and attaching the required documents. These documents include a statement supporting the application, detailing the reasons for recognizing the trademark as well-known. The government fees for filing of such application is 1,00,000 Rupees per application.

  1. Evidence Submission

The applicant has to gather and submit substantial evidence of the trademark’s recognition and reputation, including market surveys, sales figures, advertisements, and media coverage.

  1. Examination Stage

The Registrar examines the application and evidence to determine if the mark qualifies as well-known, ensuring only marks with genuine recognition are granted this status.

  1. Publication 

Upon recognition, the mark is published in the Trademarks Journal for third-party opposition. If no opposition is filed within the stipulated time, typically four months, the mark is granted the status of a well-known trademark. However, it is important to note that even after the introduction of Rule 124, the courts continue to have the power to decide whether a trademark qualifies as “well-known.” 

Case Study: Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan

  • Background

In the landmark case of Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan, a critical issue unfolded. An undergarment retailer boldly adopted the term ‘Benz’ in its brand name and introduced a logo eerily resembling the emblem famously associated with the automotive giant, Mercedes-Benz. This emblem, the iconic three-star ring, is celebrated globally for its automotive legacy. Intriguingly, the defendant ventured into the undergarment domain while employing a logo featuring a human figure enclosed within a three-pointed ring. Mercedes-Benz took legal action against the defendant.

  • Verdict

The court called the defendant’s actions a trademark infringement. The Mercedes-Benz three-star ring is highly regarded in the automotive industry. The court ruled and stopped the defendant from using the three-star ring and the term “Benz” with undergarments. The judgement was well-known worldwide, showing the strong global reputation of the Mercedes-Benz trademark. It was acknowledged that it is widely known that “Benz” is strongly associated with the automotive industry. The verdict confirmed that using a well-known mark in a different industry is both infringement and an attempt to benefit from its worldwide recognition.

This case stands as a testament to the imperative of safeguarding well-known trademarks on a worldwide scale. It underscores the necessity for robust legal measures to preserve the integrity of well-known marks, preventing unauthorized use that could dilute their reputation and create confusion among consumers worldwide.

Significance of Well-Known Marks 

Well-known trademarks have assumed a heightened significance in India’s dynamic business landscape. As the Indian economy continues to grow, both domestic and international brands are vying for consumer attention. In such a competitive environment, well-known marks are invaluable. They not only assure consumers of the quality and authenticity of products and services but also foster brand loyalty.

Additionally, well-known marks have a substantial impact on trademark litigation. The recognition of a mark as “well-known” can significantly strengthen a trademark owner’s position in legal disputes, making it more challenging for infringers to argue that they were unaware of the mark’s reputation.

Conclusion

In India, as in the rest of the world, well-known trademarks hold immense value for both businesses and consumers. They symbolise reliability, quality, and an enduring tradition of excellence. The legal framework of India acknowledges the significance of safeguarding these trademarks, ensuring that they continue to flourish and retain their individuality. The well-considered legal provisions, filing procedure, and trademark rules of 2017 aid in preserving the integrity and reputation of well-known trademarks, thereby fostering innovation and the expansion of national brands.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Categories

Search

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • All Post
    • Copyright
    • Design Patents
    • Patent Filing
    • Patent Search
    • Trademark

    Related Posts

    Importance of Trademarking your Restaurant Name - Intellect Vidhya

    Importance of Trademarking your Restaurant Name

    Have you ever walked into a restaurant, drawn by its catchy name or eye-catching logo, only to discover that it’s not the establishment you thought it was? In the bustling food and hospitality industry of India, this scenario is becoming increasingly common. As more and more eateries pop up, it’s crucial for restaurant owners to protect their brand’s identity through trademark registration. A trademark is like a unique fingerprint that sets your goods or services apart from the competition. It’s a legal stamp that says, “This is ours, and no one else can use it.” And in the world of restaurants, where first impressions can make or break your business, a strong trademark can be a game-changer. Why Trademarks Matter for Restaurateurs? Success Stories of Trademarked Restaurant Brands The Consequences of Neglecting Trademark Protection In the vibrant culinary landscape of India, trademarking your restaurant brand is more than just a formality – it’s a strategic move that can safeguard your business identity, maintain brand recognition, and provide legal recourse against infringement. By understanding the importance of trademarks and understanding the appropriate registration process under Indian trademark law, you can protect your valuable intellectual property and pave the way for a future as bright as a perfectly cooked dish, fresh out of the kitchen.

    Read More »
    July 13, 2024 No Comments
    The Significance Of Prior Use In The Trademark Law Vans V Ivans - Intellect Vidhya

    The Significance of Prior Use in the Trademark Law: Vans v. Ivans

    In the complex realm of intellectual property rights, few principles hold as much significance as the concept of “prior use” in Indian trademark law. The recent ruling by the Delhi High Court in the Vans v. Ivans case has brought attention to the fundamental concept of giving precedence to the first user of a trademark in the market. The Vans v. Ivans Case: The case centred on a disagreement between Vans Inc., a well-known American footwear and apparel company, and FCB Garment Tex, an Indian company that used the “IVANS” trademark. Vans Inc. filed a request to invalidate FCB Garment Tex’s trademark registration in India, claiming that their “VANS” mark had recently gained recognition as a well-known trademark in the country. Nevertheless, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of FCB Garment Tex, citing the prior use principle. Important Factors in the Court’s Decision The court’s ruling was influenced by several crucial elements. Firstly, it emphasised that FCB Garment Tex had been using the “IVANS” mark in India for years before Vans Inc. entered the market, applying the “first in the market” principle. Furthermore, the court made it clear that simply declaring a trademark as well-known does not automatically give the owner the authority to cancel other marks that were used earlier in India. Finally, the court determined that FCB Garment’s utilisation of the marks was both sincere and simultaneous, granting them protection under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act. Supporting the Principle of Prior Use This landmark ruling is a strong affirmation of the prior use principle in Indian trademark law. This principle emphasises that the initial user of a trademark in the market holds greater rights compared to later users, regardless of their registration status. This concept is deeply embedded in the Indian Trade Marks Act, 1999, and aims to safeguard businesses that have dedicated significant time and resources to establish their brand identity in the market. The Reasoning Behind Prior Use There are several reasons behind the prior use principle. It strives to recognise and safeguard businesses that have proactively built their brands in the marketplace. By prioritising the initial user, the law recognises the dedication and resources required to establish a strong brand presence and cultivate customer loyalty. This principle also helps to prevent unfair competition by ensuring that well-known brands are not replaced by new ones with similar marks, thus maintaining consumer trust and market stability. Territorial Nature of Trademark Rights In addition, the principle of prior use acknowledges the territorial nature of trademark rights. The Vans v. Ivans case clearly illustrates that having a worldwide reputation is not enough to establish legal rights in a particular jurisdiction. The principle highlights the significance of establishing a tangible market presence and utilising a trademark within India, rather than solely relying on international recognition or registration in other nations. Engaging with well-known Trademarks The prior use principle also has implications for other aspects of trademark law, including the recognition of well-known trademarks. The ruling by the Delhi High Court provides clarity on the advantages of having a well-known trademark status, while also acknowledging the rights of prior users in the market. This delicate equilibrium ensures the safeguarding of well-known local brands while acknowledging the prestige and recognition of globally renowned trademarks. Practical Considerations for Trademark Owners In practice, trademark owners are faced with a significant burden of maintaining proper documentation of their trademark use due to the prior use principle. This encompasses sales records, advertisements, and proof of customer recognition. Consistent and authentic use of the mark is essential, as any substantial gaps in usage can undermine a prior use claim. Conclusion Ultimately, the verdict of the Delhi High Court in the Vans v. Ivans case serves as a strong affirmation of the prior use principle within Indian trademark law. It emphasises the significance of having a strong market presence and building a reputable brand in order to establish and safeguard trademark rights in India. As the country continues to attract global brands while nurturing its own business ecosystem, this principle will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the development of trademark strategies and dispute resolutions.

    Read More »
    July 12, 2024 No Comments
    The Ethical and Legal Dilemma of AI Voice Cloning in the Music Industry - Intellect Vidhya

    The Ethical and Legal Dilemma of AI Voice Cloning in the Music Industry

    In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made remarkable progress in various fields, including music production. Voice cloning in music has been a subject of intense debate, raising questions about copyright infringement, moral rights, and the preservation of artistic integrity. The recent criticism voiced by legendary Indian playback singer Kumar Sanu against AI voice duplication brings attention to the mounting concerns within the music industry. Power and Potential of AI Voice Cloning AI voice cloning technology has made significant progress in recreating the voices of singers with outstanding precision. This ability has resulted in the development of new songs that utilise the voices of artists who have passed away, as demonstrated in the recent example of “Pehle Hi Main.” This song was created using an AI-generated voice that mimics the late Mohammed Rafi, who sadly passed away in 1980. Although this technology presents fascinating opportunities for music production and preservation, it also brings up important ethical and legal concerns. Dealing with Copyright Infringement Copyright infringement is a significant legal concern when it comes to AI voice cloning. A singer’s voice is regarded as their valuable asset, safeguarded by copyright laws in numerous jurisdictions. When AI is employed to imitate a singer’s voice without authorization, it may potentially infringe upon copyright protections. This encompasses violations of reproduction rights, distribution rights, and the unauthorised creation of derivative works. Moral Rights and Personality Rights In addition to copyright concerns, AI voice cloning also brings up ethical and legal questions surrounding moral rights and personality rights. It is important for singers to safeguard their work from any alterations or manipulations that may negatively impact their reputation. Additionally, there is a potential for confusion and misrepresentation when AI-generated voices are not explicitly identified. Furthermore, in numerous legal systems, people possess the authority to regulate the commercial exploitation of their identity, appearance, or voice. Voice cloning might be perceived as a violation of these rights. Cloning the Voices of Deceased Artists Using AI to replicate the voices of deceased artists, such as Mohammed Rafi, brings about a whole new set of challenges. Although copyright protection usually lasts for many years after an artist’s passing, the ethical considerations surrounding the use of a deceased artist’s voice without their permission are quite substantial. There are concerns regarding the preservation of the legacy and artistic intentions of deceased musicians. Industry Response Kumar Sanu’s decision to pursue legal protection against AI voice cloning demonstrates a rising recognition of these concerns within the music industry. Other artists and industry professionals are also advocating for the establishment of regulatory frameworks to oversee the utilisation of AI in music production. There are several potential solutions being discussed to address the challenges posed by AI in music. These include establishing licencing protocols for the use of AI-cloned voices, requiring clear disclosure when AI voice cloning is used in a production, and developing specific laws to tackle these unique challenges. The Path Forward As AI technology advances, it is essential for the legal system to stay up to date. Collaboration between the music industry, legislators, and AI developers is crucial in establishing a framework that balances the protection of artists’ rights with the promotion of innovation. This could potentially include the need to revise copyright laws to specifically tackle AI-generated content, setting industry norms for the ethical application of AI in music production, and devising methods for artists to maintain control over and profit from the utilisation of their AI-replicated voices. Conclusion The emergence of AI voice cloning technology brings forth a range of possibilities and complexities for the music industry. Although it presents exciting opportunities for creativity, it also raises serious concerns regarding artists’ rights and the authenticity of their work. As evidenced by Kumar Sanu’s case, it is clear that there is a pressing requirement for the establishment of legal and ethical frameworks to regulate the utilisation of this technology. As we move forward with the more enhanced versions of AI, it’s crucial to find a harmony between technological advancement and safeguarding artists’ rights. It is crucial to establish thoughtful regulation and foster industry cooperation to ensure that AI positively impacts the creative ecosystem of the music industry.

    Read More »
    July 8, 2024 No Comments
    Understanding Personality Rights in MEME ERA - Intellect Vidhya

    Understanding Personality Rights in MEME ERA

    What do personality rights entail? Before we delve into the recent legal disputes, let’s first grasp the concept of personality rights. In basic terms, personality rights (also referred to as publicity rights) refer to the rights that an individual has to manage the commercial use of their name, image, likeness, or other distinctive aspects of their identity. These rights hold great significance for celebrities, as their public image often holds substantial commercial worth. The Growing Importance of Personality Rights in India: Striking a Balance Between Safeguarding Celebrities and Preserving Freedom of Expression India has witnessed a notable increase in legal cases concerning the rights of individuals, especially those in the public eye such as celebrities and media personalities. These cases have ignited discussions about finding a balance between an individual’s personal rights and the essential right to freedom of expression. Let’s delve into three recent cases that have significantly influenced India’s perspective on personality rights. The Jackie Shroff Saga In May 2024, Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff took legal action to safeguard his identity, voice, images, and his well-known catchphrase “Bhidu” (a popular slang term for friend in Mumbai) against any unauthorised usage. The decision made by the Delhi High Court was intriguing as it took into account not only Shroff’s rights, but also other relevant factors. The court declined to remove a YouTuber’s parody video that cleverly utilised Shroff’s persona. The judge acknowledged the artistic nature of these videos and their potential as a source of income for young creators. This decision demonstrated a growing recognition among courts of the significance of online content creation and meme culture, particularly among younger individuals. Anil Kapoor’s Case: In a previous incident, Anil Kapoor, another renowned actor, found himself in a legal battle for comparable motives. In this instance, the court examined personality rights from a unique perspective – as a means of safeguarding a celebrity’s livelihood. The court emphasised the potential impact on a celebrity’s income from endorsements and other business deals when their image or voice is used without permission. They likened it to piracy, implying that exploiting a celebrity’s persona could be akin to robbing them of their earnings. India TV and Aap Ki Adalat: In May 2024, a highly debated incident unfolded, centering around Rajat Sharma, a prominent TV journalist, and his show “Aap Ki Adalat” (Your Court). A satirist, Ravindra Kumar Choudhary, has been using the names “Jhandiya TV” (a play on words meaning “Depressing TV”) and “Baap ki Adalat” (Father’s Court) in his content. The court ruled that Choudhary must cease using these names, as they were found to violate India TV’s trademarks and Sharma’s rights to his own identity. This decision caused concern among individuals who value free speech, as they feared it could potentially hinder the creation of parodies or the ability to comment on public figures. Why is this relevant to you? You may be curious about the significance of these celebrity court cases for everyday individuals. Allow me to explain: 1. Impact on Content Creation: These cases have an influence on the type of content that creators are able to produce. If courts become more stringent, it could potentially pose challenges for creating parodies or offering commentary on public figures. 2. Online Content: Numerous young individuals generate income by producing online content. These decisions have a significant impact on the actions and content creators can take in their videos or posts. 3. Public Debate: In a democracy, it’s crucial to have the freedom to engage in discussions and even poke fun at public figures. These cases have a significant impact on the extent to which we are able to exercise our freedom. What comes after this? As India grapples with these intricate matters, here are a few suggestions that could contribute to establishing a more equitable system: 1. Improved Guidelines: It is important for courts to establish more precise rules when it comes to striking a balance between protecting personality rights and upholding free speech, particularly in the context of parodies and satire. 2. Caution in Issuing Court Orders: It is important for courts to exercise caution when issuing orders that restrict content, ensuring that both sides of the story are heard. 3. Recognising Varied Uses: It’s important to distinguish between utilising someone’s image for financial gain and using it for the purpose of commentary or critique. It is important for courts to acknowledge and understand this distinction. 4. Public Interest: Courts must consider the potential value of allowing commentary on public

    Read More »
    July 4, 2024 No Comments