Well-known Trademarks in India

In today’s interconnected world, trademarks play a crucial role in differentiating products and services while also functioning as valuable business assets. Among the various types of trademarks, well-known trademarks occupy an exclusive spot. Well-known marks are the marks that have achieved exceptional recognition and reputation, transcending geographic boundaries. India, with its rich trademark jurisprudence, recognizes the significance of well-known trademarks and has put in place legal provisions to ensure their protection. In this article, we will delve into what well-known trademarks are, discuss the legal provisions, and shed light on the filing procedure.

What is a Well- Known Trademark?

A well-known trademark, also known as a “famous trademark,” is a mark that has garnered substantial public recognition and favour. These trademarks are readily distinguishable and are strongly associated with a particular brand or product. They have expanded their influence outside of their respective industries, garnering recognition in a variety of fields. Companies place a high value on their well-known trademarks and afford them extensive legal protection.

Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 defines “well-known trade mark”, “in relation to any goods or services, means a mark which has become so to the substantial segment of the public which uses such goods or receives such services that the use of such mark in relation to other goods or services would be likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade or rendering of services between those goods or services and a person using the mark in relation to the first-mentioned goods or services.”

Examples of Famous Trademarks

  • Google: As the world’s leading search engine, Google has become synonymous with internet searching. It’s simple and colourful logo is instantly recognizable.
  • Nike: The Nike swoosh is an iconic symbol in the sports and apparel industry. Nike’s “Just Do It” slogan is also widely recognized and associated with athleticism.
  • Amazon: The smiling arrow from Amazon’s logo represents customer satisfaction. Amazon’s e-commerce platform is used by millions worldwide, and its services extend beyond online shopping.
  • Ferrari: The prancing horse emblem of Ferrari is synonymous with luxury sports cars. Ferrari is known for its high-performance vehicles.

Deciding Factors for well-known trademarks

To determine the eligibility of a trademark for well-known status in India under Section 11(6) of the Trademarks Act, 1999, specific criteria must be met:

  • The trademark must have achieved a high level of recognition and goodwill among the relevant section of the public, including knowledge in India obtained through promotional efforts.
  • The trademark’s use should be substantial and consistent over time, with a wide geographical presence.
  • The trademark’s promotional efforts, such as advertising, publicity, and presentations at fairs or exhibitions, should be extensive in scope.
  • The duration and geographical area of trademark registration or application for registration under the Act reflect the use and recognition of the trademark.
  • A successful record of enforcing the rights associated with the trademark, including recognition as a well-known mark by courts or Registrars, is a crucial factor.

Filing Procedure for Well-Known Trademarks

Rule 124 of the Trademark Rules, 2017, provides the process for filing a well-known trademark in India. This process involves the following steps:

  1. Filing an application

Any interested party can submit an application online by filling out Form TM-M and attaching the required documents. These documents include a statement supporting the application, detailing the reasons for recognizing the trademark as well-known. The government fees for filing of such application is 1,00,000 Rupees per application.

  1. Evidence Submission

The applicant has to gather and submit substantial evidence of the trademark’s recognition and reputation, including market surveys, sales figures, advertisements, and media coverage.

  1. Examination Stage

The Registrar examines the application and evidence to determine if the mark qualifies as well-known, ensuring only marks with genuine recognition are granted this status.

  1. Publication 

Upon recognition, the mark is published in the Trademarks Journal for third-party opposition. If no opposition is filed within the stipulated time, typically four months, the mark is granted the status of a well-known trademark. However, it is important to note that even after the introduction of Rule 124, the courts continue to have the power to decide whether a trademark qualifies as “well-known.” 

Case Study: Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan

  • Background

In the landmark case of Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft & Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan, a critical issue unfolded. An undergarment retailer boldly adopted the term ‘Benz’ in its brand name and introduced a logo eerily resembling the emblem famously associated with the automotive giant, Mercedes-Benz. This emblem, the iconic three-star ring, is celebrated globally for its automotive legacy. Intriguingly, the defendant ventured into the undergarment domain while employing a logo featuring a human figure enclosed within a three-pointed ring. Mercedes-Benz took legal action against the defendant.

  • Verdict

The court called the defendant’s actions a trademark infringement. The Mercedes-Benz three-star ring is highly regarded in the automotive industry. The court ruled and stopped the defendant from using the three-star ring and the term “Benz” with undergarments. The judgement was well-known worldwide, showing the strong global reputation of the Mercedes-Benz trademark. It was acknowledged that it is widely known that “Benz” is strongly associated with the automotive industry. The verdict confirmed that using a well-known mark in a different industry is both infringement and an attempt to benefit from its worldwide recognition.

This case stands as a testament to the imperative of safeguarding well-known trademarks on a worldwide scale. It underscores the necessity for robust legal measures to preserve the integrity of well-known marks, preventing unauthorized use that could dilute their reputation and create confusion among consumers worldwide.

Significance of Well-Known Marks 

Well-known trademarks have assumed a heightened significance in India’s dynamic business landscape. As the Indian economy continues to grow, both domestic and international brands are vying for consumer attention. In such a competitive environment, well-known marks are invaluable. They not only assure consumers of the quality and authenticity of products and services but also foster brand loyalty.

Additionally, well-known marks have a substantial impact on trademark litigation. The recognition of a mark as “well-known” can significantly strengthen a trademark owner’s position in legal disputes, making it more challenging for infringers to argue that they were unaware of the mark’s reputation.

Conclusion

In India, as in the rest of the world, well-known trademarks hold immense value for both businesses and consumers. They symbolise reliability, quality, and an enduring tradition of excellence. The legal framework of India acknowledges the significance of safeguarding these trademarks, ensuring that they continue to flourish and retain their individuality. The well-considered legal provisions, filing procedure, and trademark rules of 2017 aid in preserving the integrity and reputation of well-known trademarks, thereby fostering innovation and the expansion of national brands.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Categories

Search

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • All Post
    • Copyright
    • Design Patents
    • Patent Filing
    • Patent Search
    • Trademark

    Related Posts

    The Role of Design Patents in Enhancing Brand Value in India - Intellect Vidhya

    The Role of Design Patents in Enhancing Brand Value in India

    In today’s highly competitive marketplace, businesses are constantly seeking ways to differentiate themselves from their competitors and establish a strong brand identity. One strategic tool that companies can leverage to achieve this goal is the design patent. Design patents, which protect the ornamental or aesthetic features of a product, can play a crucial role in enhancing brand value and fostering customer recognition and loyalty. How Design Patents Contribute to Brand Differentiation Examples of Brands That Have Leveraged Design Patents Effectively These examples demonstrate how design patents can serve as a powerful tool for brands to differentiate themselves in the marketplace, establish a unique visual identity, and enhance their overall brand value and recognition. By protecting their distinctive product designs through patents, these companies have created iconic and instantly recognizable products that resonate with consumers and contribute to their brand’s success and positioning. Tips for Using Design Patents as a Marketing Tool Conclusion In the highly competitive Indian market, design patents can be a powerful tool for companies seeking to enhance their brand value and establish a unique identity. By leveraging the exclusivity and distinctiveness offered by design patents, brands can differentiate themselves, foster consumer recognition, and ultimately strengthen their competitive position in the marketplace. The examples provided above showcase how design patents can be effectively utilized to create visually distinct and memorable products that resonate with consumers and contribute to brand recognition and loyalty. By incorporating design patents into their marketing and branding strategies, companies can elevate their brand’s perceived value, differentiate themselves from competitors, and cultivate a loyal customer base that appreciates and recognizes the uniqueness of their offerings.

    Read More »
    May 24, 2024 No Comments
    Recent Trends in Patent Filing in India Conventional and National Phase Routes

    Recent Trends in Patent Filing in India: Conventional and National Phase Routes

    The landscape of patent filing in India has witnessed significant changes over recent years, influenced by global economic shifts, advancements in technology, and evolving legal frameworks. Two primary routes dominate the patent filing process in India: the conventional route and the national phase route under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Understanding recent trends in these routes provides valuable insights for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. Conventional Route Trends The conventional route, which involves filing a patent application directly with the Indian Patent Office within 12 months of the priority date, has seen a steady increase in activity. This route is often favoured by domestic applicants and businesses seeking to protect innovations promptly within the country. Growth in Domestic Applications: There has been a noticeable rise in patent applications from Indian inventors and small to medium enterprises (SMEs). This trend is fuelled by increased awareness of intellectual property rights and government initiatives such as the “Startup India” campaign, which offers reduced filing fees for startups. Technological Advancements: Sectors like biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, information technology, and artificial intelligence have dominated recent filings. Innovations in these areas reflect India’s growing prowess in high-tech and research-driven industries. Streamlined Processes: The Indian Patent Office has made efforts to streamline the patent examination process, reducing the time taken to grant patents. Initiatives like the expedited examination for startups and the electronic filing system have contributed to more efficient processing of applications. National Phase Route Trends The national phase route, allowing international applicants to enter India’s patent system under the PCT within 31 months from the priority date, continues to be a popular choice for foreign entities seeking protection in India. Increase in International Filings: India’s robust market potential and favourable IP environment have led to an increase in national phase entries. Companies from the United States, Europe, Japan, and China are prominent users of this route, reflecting India’s importance as a key market for global innovation. Diverse Technological Domains: Similar to the conventional route, the national phase route has seen a surge in applications in advanced technology sectors. Notably, there has been significant activity in renewable energy technologies, medical devices, and consumer electronics. Legal and Regulatory Developments: Recent amendments in Indian patent laws, aimed at harmonizing with international standards, have made the national phase route more attractive. The introduction of measures like the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) with Japan has facilitated faster processing of applications, thereby encouraging more international filings. Analysis of recent filing trends for both routes Recent filing trends for patents in India, through both the conventional and national phase routes, indicate a robust growth in domestic and international patent activity. The conventional route has seen a rise in applications from Indian inventors and SMEs, spurred by government initiatives and heightened IP awareness, with notable filings in biotechnology, IT, and AI sectors. Concurrently, the national phase route under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) has attracted increasing international interest, particularly from the US, Europe, Japan, and China, driven by India’s expanding market potential and improved regulatory environment. Technological advancements and streamlined processes, such as expedited examinations and electronic filing, have further enhanced the appeal of patenting in India. Impact of technological advancements on filing strategies Technological advancements are significantly reshaping patent filing strategies, compelling inventors and companies to adopt more sophisticated and proactive approaches. The rise of cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and renewable energy has led to a surge in complex and interdisciplinary inventions, necessitating comprehensive prior art searches and strategic global filings to secure broad and robust protection. Additionally, advancements in digital tools and patent analytics enable applicants to identify optimal filing routes, anticipate market trends, and streamline the drafting and submission processes. As a result, the integration of technology into IP management not only enhances the efficiency and precision of patent filings but also strengthens the strategic positioning of patents in a competitive marketplace. Predictions for future trends in patent filings Future trends in patent filings are likely to be characterized by an increasing emphasis on emerging technologies and sustainability. Innovations in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and green technologies are expected to dominate patent landscapes, driven by ongoing research and global efforts to address environmental challenges. Additionally, the patent filing process will continue to evolve with advancements in digital tools, such as AI-powered patent analytics and blockchain for secure and transparent IP management, making the process more efficient and accessible. Geographic trends may also shift, with developing countries like India and China playing a more prominent role in global patent activity. As businesses and inventors seek to protect their innovations in a rapidly changing world, strategic, international, and collaborative patent filings will become increasingly crucial. Challenges and Opportunities Despite the positive trends, several challenges remain. The backlog of pending applications, although reduced, still poses a hurdle. Additionally, ensuring consistent quality in patent examination is critical as the volume of applications grows. However, these challenges also present opportunities. Continued investments in digitization, capacity building within the Patent Office, and fostering a more innovation-friendly ecosystem can further enhance India’s position as a global patent filing destination. Conclusion The evolving landscape of patent filing in India, encompassing both the conventional and national phase routes, highlights a dynamic interplay between domestic innovation and international interest. The conventional route has become increasingly popular among Indian inventors and SMEs, driven by government initiatives and a growing awareness of intellectual property rights. Meanwhile, the national phase route under the PCT attracts substantial international filings, reflecting India’s significance as a key market for global innovation. Technological advancements are reshaping filing strategies, enabling more efficient and strategic patent management. Future trends are expected to focus on emerging technologies and sustainability, with India poised to play an even more prominent role in the global patent arena. While challenges such as application backlogs and quality consistency remain, they also present opportunities for further improvements. By continuing to invest in digitization and capacity building, India can enhance its position as a leading destination for patent filings, benefiting inventors

    Read More »
    May 15, 2024 No Comments
    NBA Approval for Patent Application - What, When, Who, Why, and How - Intellect Vidhya

    NBA Approval for Patent Application – What, When, Who, Why, and How?

    What is NBA? NBA stands for National Biodiversity Association which is a statutory body that was established in 2003 by the Central government for the purpose of the Biological diversity Act, 2002 to regulate access and equitable sharing of benefits arising from any biological resources. What is a Biological Resource? As per Section 2(c) of the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act (BDA), 2023, “biological resources” includes plants, animals, micro-organisms or parts of their genetic material and derivatives (excluding value added products) with actual or potential use or value but does not include human genetic material wherein “derivative” means a naturally occurring biochemical compound or metabolism of biological resources, even if it does not contain functional units of heredity. When Do We Need NBA Approval? It is mandatory to apply for NBA approval under BDA 2002 through Form 3 with appropriate fee (INR 500) before patent application in or outside India under the following condition: The NBA approval shall be obtained prior to the grant of the Patent provided that the NBA shall dispose of the application for permission made to it within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt thereof. In case of foreign jurisdiction, NBA approval shall be granted only to those countries that are intimated in the Form 3. Relevant Sections (1A) Any person applying for any intellectual property right, by whatever name called, in or outside India, for any invention based on any research or information on a biological resource which is accessed from India, including those deposited in repositories outside India, or traditional knowledge associated thereto, shall register with the National Biodiversity Authority before grant of such intellectual property rights. (1B) Any person who has obtained intellectual property right, by whatever name called, in or outside India, for any invention based on any research or information on a biological resource which is accessed from India, including those deposited in repositories outside India, or traditional knowledge associated thereto, shall obtain prior approval of the National Biodiversity Authority at the time of commercialization. When Do We Not Need NBA Approval? NBA approval is not required in following cases: Relevant Section & Definitions Why Should Apply For NBA Approval? The following applicants should apply for NBA approval before patent application disclosing biological resources from India: Why To Disclose Biological Resource & Apply For NBA Approval? The National Biodiversity Authority may, while granting the approval under section 6(2) of BDA, 2002, impose benefit sharing fee or royalty or both or impose conditions including the sharing of financial benefits arising out of the commercial utilization of such rights from biological resources. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 has a penal provision in this regard under section 55 (1) which provides that “whoever contravenes or attempts to contravene or abets the contravention of the provisions of the section 3 or section 4 or section 6 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees and where the damage caused exceeds ten lakh rupees such fine may commensurate with the damage caused, or with both.” If the complete specification does not disclose or wrongly mentions the biological material source and geographical origin, then, according to clause (j) of Sections 25(1) and 25(2) respectively of the Patents Act, 1970, it will create a ground for pre and post-grant opposition. If NBA approval is not obtained/submitted, a controller can file an objection in the examination report. Even if one did not raise the complaint during the examination process, it could be brought subsequently. How To Apply For NBA Approval? For the sake of patent application, a person seeking approval from the NBA must make an application on NBA Form 3 through ABS (Access and Benefit Sharing) e-filing with INR 500 as a fee. The particulars that are required for Form 3 application is given below: 1. Full particulars of the applicant including (a) Name of the applicant (s) as indicated in the IPR application submitted to the Patent Office. (b) Complete address of the applicant (s) with state/province name/country and PIN code/zip code, Telephone/ Fax Number (Land line with code), Mobile Number and Email address. (c) Complete professional profile or bio-data of the applicant (s) not exceeding one page. (d) Bona fide letter in original from the institution or organisation with whom the applicant (s) is affiliated. 2. Details of the invention on which IPRs sought including (a) Full and exact title and abstract of IPR on which application is made. (b) Patent office reference number, if application is filed before the Patent Office. 3. Details of the biological resources and or/associated knowledge used in the invention including (a) Scientific name(s) of the biological resource(s) (b) common name(s) of the biological resource(s) (c) Details of associated knowledge used and source of such information, if applicable. (d) Provide copy of approval of NBA for access to biological resources and/ or associated knowledge (if the applicant is covered under Section 3(2) of BD Act) 4. Geographical location from where the biological resources used in the invention are collected (a) Indicate the name of village, panchayat, block, taluk, district and state from where the biological resource(s) were collected. (b) If the biological resource(s) were collected or procured from the Institute/ Organization/ Company/local trader/individual, provide exact contact details (address and phone number) of such supplier and invoice/evidence for such purchase. (c) Indicate whether the material was sourced from wild/cultivated 5. Details of any traditional knowledge used in the invention and any identified individual/ community holding the traditional knowledge (a) Provide full details of individual/communities holding such traditional knowledge (b) In case, this knowledge sourced from texts provide source of such information (photocopies of relevant information may be attached wherever applicable) 6. Details of Institution where Research and Development Activities carried out (a) Name and address of the institute where research was carried out. (b) Please provide details of collaboration with other institutions/organization/company, if any, during the course of research activities. 7. Details

    Read More »
    May 15, 2024 No Comments
    Ideas vs Expression The Fundamental Divide in Copyright Law - Intellect Vidhya

    Ideas vs Expression: The Fundamental Divide in Copyright Law

    Copyright law is a fine balance, striving to encourage and safeguard creative expression while also allowing ideas and concepts to be freely accessible for others to expand upon. The core of this equilibrium is rooted in the essential differentiation between concepts and their manifestation – a principle that has influenced the field of copyright law for generations. The Idea/Expression Dichotomy The concept of the idea/expression dichotomy is a widely recognised principle in copyright law that distinguishes between the conceptual aspects of a work and their physical representation. Essentially, it acknowledges that although ideas cannot be copyrighted, the unique way in which those ideas are expressed can be legally protected. This dichotomy serves several important purposes. First and foremost, it safeguards the free flow of ideas, which are considered the building blocks of human progress and innovation. By preventing the monopolization of ideas, copyright law fosters a vibrant marketplace of creative discourse, where ideas can be freely explored, debated, and built upon. Furthermore, the idea/expression divide recognises the inherent restriction of copyright. It does not encompass abstract concepts or principles, but rather centres on the concrete, unique expression of those concepts. This ensures that copyright safeguards the creator’s distinct contribution while still allowing others to derive inspiration from the fundamental concepts and produce their own innovative creations. Defining Ideas and Expression But what constitutes an “idea” versus an “expression” can often be a complex and nuanced determination. In general, ideas are considered the foundational concepts, principles, themes, or plots that form the basis of a work. These may include scientific theories, historical facts, philosophical musings, or broad narrative premises. Expression, on the other hand, refers to the specific way in which those ideas are articulated, manifested, or conveyed. It encompasses the author’s unique selection, arrangement, and synthesis of words, images, sounds, or other elements that give tangible form to the underlying idea. For example, the idea of a young wizard attending a school for magic cannot be copyrighted, as it is a broad premise or concept. However, the specific characters, settings, plotlines, and descriptive language used in a book like “Harry Potter” would constitute the protectable expression of that idea. Merging and Scènes à Faire While the idea/expression dichotomy provides a guiding principle, its application can be challenging, particularly when ideas and expression become closely intertwined or when certain elements are dictated by external constraints or conventions. The “merger doctrine” addresses situations where an idea can only be expressed in a limited number of ways, essentially merging the idea and expression. In such cases, copyright protection may be limited or absent, as granting a monopoly over the expression would effectively grant a monopoly over the idea itself. Similarly, the “scènes à faire” doctrine recognizes that certain elements or scenes may be inherent to a particular genre or setting and are therefore not protectable as original expression. For instance, a romantic comedy might include common tropes or scenarios that are expected within the genre, and these would not be considered protectable elements. Evolving Challenges in the Digital Age The advent of new technologies and digital media has introduced additional complexities to the idea/expression divide. Software code, for instance, straddles the line between functional ideas and creative expression, presenting challenges in determining the appropriate scope of copyright protection. Similarly, the proliferation of user-generated content and remix culture has brought renewed focus on the boundaries between transformative expression and unauthorized derivative works. As the creative landscape continues to evolve, courts, legislators, and intellectual property experts must continually refine and adapt the application of the idea/expression dichotomy to address emerging issues while preserving the fundamental principles of copyright law. Conclusion The idea/expression dichotomy is a cornerstone of copyright law, striking a delicate balance between incentivizing creative expression and maintaining a vibrant public domain of ideas. While its application can be nuanced and context-specific, this fundamental principle remains essential for fostering innovation, safeguarding free speech, and promoting the progress of knowledge and creativity. 

    Read More »
    April 17, 2024 No Comments